Wednesday, May 30, 2012

Conflict in the Digital Age



Stuxnet: Computer worm opens new era of warfare

In this ever-changing digital era, it seems that a not so new but incredibly evolved form of warfare has begun before our eyes, yet society is really not aware of it. It began in June of 2010, a small company in Belarus after a client in Iran had complained about a software glitch. Within a month computer security experts analyzed what became know as Stuxnet. This was a computer virus like no other. This was beyond cutting edge and highly sophisticated. What separates Stuxnet from all other computer viruses was that it wasn’t looking to steal money or identities or passwords; it was after an industrial operation and it was being spread by simple USB thumb drives. After tracking it they found that the highest number of infections had been Iran. Experts figured out it were trying to damage an Iranian nuclear plant and concluded that it set the Iranian program back by several years. What if no one had caught on to it, and who could be the next target?
            We’ve entered a new stage of conflict where we use cyber weapons to create physical destruction. This has us asking our officials how safe is our own (U.S.) infrastructure? Our clock is now literally ticking. Cyberspace is a domain of conflict, and we could be next. Some experts claim it could be the next Pearl Harbor at the rate it is going. With such sophisticated viruses such as Stuxnet, they can target and literally shut down power plants, water treatment facilities, chemicals plants and other types of plants our nation depends on. With Congress wanting to pass the first cyber security law, after previously failing in the past multiple times, it has become a fierce debate over whether our government should be allowed to require the owners of certain infrastructure’s to improve security of their computer networks. Senator Collins of Maine went as far to state, “I can’t think of another area in homeland security where the threat is greater and we’ve done less”.

No comments:

Post a Comment