Friday, June 1, 2012

Post #4 Privacy


http://rockcenter.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/06/01/11995859-digital-afterlife-what-happens-to-your-online-accounts-when-you-die

Digital Afterlife: What happens to your online accounts when you die?

            In 2011, Benjamin Stassen was 21 years old when he committed suicide. Living in this digital era, Benjamin's parents wanted to find clues as to why their son decided to end his life. They realized the best shot they have are his online accounts, mainly social media sites.
            After sending in a court order to Facebook requesting access to their deceased son's account, Facebook replied saying they're sorry for their loss but due to privacy policies, they were unable to release contents. But the Stassen's weren't going to stop there. They wanted answers, and these answers could be hidden in their deceased son's social media accounts, and if not it could at the least be some form of closure for the grieving parents.
            Currently, only five states have estate laws that include digital assets; Connecticut, Rhode Island, Oklahoma, Indiana and Idaho. With the exception of Oklahoma and Idaho including social networking and blogging as part of these estates, the other three only include e-mail. But even then, they still must confront the social networking site itself, as the Stassen's did with Facebook.
            Yes most people don't think about what's going to happen to their online accounts when they die, but perhaps people are start going to when more cases like this arise.
            Google, Yahoo and Facebook have taken the position that the user probably intended for the contents of their account to remain private, which is why they choose to not disclose any user's information once deceased. These companies have certain expectations of privacy with users accounts. Perhaps because of the liability issues. There are certain states that actually prohibit internet companies from disclosing information without the permission of the user. But what about the Stassen's case?
            The Stassen’s have received the contents of Benjamin's Gmail account as a result of filing a court order. Google also stated that they provided this because it is a "rare occasion" and his parents are authorized representatives, however they still have not received any contents from Facebook.
            According to Facebook, there are 2 options for dead users accounts. The account can be memorialized which means the profile will be left up for family and friends to look at and post in remembrance, however it restricts the profile and associated content to the Facebook "friends" that the deceased had while alive. Or, the family members can have the account deactivated if they choose to do so.
            With majority of states not having definite law of digital assets with it comes to a users death, companies must look to their user agreements and laws of the individual states. Currently, it comes down to loved ones having to file a court order.
            So what does this mean for the future? In this digital era, where people can know where you are, who you're with and how long you've been there just by a click or touch from a smartphone or computer, clearly this issue is going to raise more concern in the near future. In the Stassen's case, it is a sad time for the family, however this is the digital era we live in. Although we think our privacy is gone due to the internet and social networking sites, it is apparent we still do have some form of definite privacy when it comes to people accessing our accounts and passwords. But isn't this what we want? Except in the rare occasions such as the Stassens. With all of the hacking that has happened to people over the years, you would think these internet companies policies are a good thing, however it seems it all comes down to the circumstances.  Yahoo for example says on its site that all accounts are non-transferable and it will delete an account when they receive a death certificate.
            So what do we do? It seems there are limited options until there is an official law passed in terms of deceased individuals digital assets. We can set up a joint account so that at least one other individual has access to the account. We can discuss with our close loved ones exactly what we want to happen with our account, however this still may include giving up your password etc. while you're still alive. Other than that it seems we must wait to see what these Internet companies decide to do. Some companies such as Entrustet and Legacy Locker allow users to come up with a plan for the life their online accounts after you've passed. For now all we can do is try to keep our accounts under control and private unless we wish to do otherwise.

Wednesday, May 30, 2012

Conflict in the Digital Age



Stuxnet: Computer worm opens new era of warfare

In this ever-changing digital era, it seems that a not so new but incredibly evolved form of warfare has begun before our eyes, yet society is really not aware of it. It began in June of 2010, a small company in Belarus after a client in Iran had complained about a software glitch. Within a month computer security experts analyzed what became know as Stuxnet. This was a computer virus like no other. This was beyond cutting edge and highly sophisticated. What separates Stuxnet from all other computer viruses was that it wasn’t looking to steal money or identities or passwords; it was after an industrial operation and it was being spread by simple USB thumb drives. After tracking it they found that the highest number of infections had been Iran. Experts figured out it were trying to damage an Iranian nuclear plant and concluded that it set the Iranian program back by several years. What if no one had caught on to it, and who could be the next target?
            We’ve entered a new stage of conflict where we use cyber weapons to create physical destruction. This has us asking our officials how safe is our own (U.S.) infrastructure? Our clock is now literally ticking. Cyberspace is a domain of conflict, and we could be next. Some experts claim it could be the next Pearl Harbor at the rate it is going. With such sophisticated viruses such as Stuxnet, they can target and literally shut down power plants, water treatment facilities, chemicals plants and other types of plants our nation depends on. With Congress wanting to pass the first cyber security law, after previously failing in the past multiple times, it has become a fierce debate over whether our government should be allowed to require the owners of certain infrastructure’s to improve security of their computer networks. Senator Collins of Maine went as far to state, “I can’t think of another area in homeland security where the threat is greater and we’ve done less”.

Tuesday, May 22, 2012

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/g/a/2012/05/18/prweb9523433.DTL






Myx TV Shatters the Digital Divide with New Program MashBox



On Monday, May 21, the premier Asian American entertainment network in the US known as Myx TV, introduced the first ever interactive multiplatform program featuring second screen technology. This new program, MashBox, by Teddy Zee Productions, is truly changing the traditional way Americans watch television, because we are now interacting.

.MashBox is enhancing the viewing experience for all audiences. Teddy Zee, executive producer of MashBox says he was originally trying to provide Asian American talent with a more hands on experience in television production. Little did he know this would lead to a revolutionary technology, truly breaking the digital divide. This breakthrough technology is making video content interactive. The mobile application is powered by Mozaik Multimedia Inc. Mozaik is available on television, computers, smartphones, tablets, Blue-ray devices, set-top boxes and other internet enabled devices.

"With the internet serving as home to today's most promising Asian American entertainers, the network fulfills its commitment of bringing Asian Americans to mainstream television through Mashbox," says Miguel Santos, Associate General Manager of Myx TV.

This revolutionary technology is changing the way we interact by a click on your phone or device. This technology is letting people bookmark whatever they choose to on their device, and from their load more content. For example, while watching MashBox, make a bookmark with their application. These hotspots contain information streaming to your device all while watching the show live. Once you click on that hotspot you will be linked to more information. If an artist is playing, you can be linked to their Facebook, twitter, iTunes songs if you would like to purchase and more.

Our technology continues to change by keeping us updated and linked to people at all times. MashBox is changing this way by not only keeping us updated while watching live television, audiences are now able to choose what they interact with and when from a live television show. This network will not only be airing a combination of original and syndicated shows, but as well as interactive music video countdowns, animation, and Independent and Asian films. "The incorporation of Mozaik's ground-breaking mobile application is a nod to our market's trendsetting ability to adapt to new technology,” says Santos.



Monday, May 21, 2012

Podcast #1

http://gwalsh.podbean.com/

Monday, May 7, 2012

Google+ faces thorny online identity issues


http://news.cnet.com/8301-30685_3-20078671-264/google-faces-thorny-online-identity-issues/


In an article from 2011 on CNET, an interesting issue was addressed concerning online identity. As social networking continues to grow, Google had decided to make their own version known as Google+ in late 2011. What makes Google+ stand out from other social networking sites is that it requires people to use their actual real-world names.

The article explains that people who choose not to disclose their real name on the account will have their account suspended. “After reviewing your profile, we determined that the name you provided violates our community standards,” said Google. This is also a problem because as the article says, although people’s names may not be the same as on their birth certificates, often they are a real persona. The main issue this article is concerning is the right to privacy. Social networking thrives because there are many options as to who you want to connect with and how you wish to do so.

I found this article to be interesting because not only do I not have a Google+ account but I wasn’t aware of these factors that come with having an account. As we learned in class, there are three elements to where our sense of identity comes from; one being “virtual identity”. This type of identity was the last to be added to this theory of where our identity comes from as a result of social networking being developed.

The cons that come along with having this account and having to put your real information is that there are people who prefer to remain anonymous or not want to have their real name and contact information for many reasons. These limitations prevent people from freely expressing themselves or remaining true to their identity. Many people prefer this identity because it is more easily relatable because you can remain anonymous if you wish to do so. Also, people who have been rejected in real life due to their sexual orientation, race, class, religion particular interests or for whatever reasons, choose to live through their virtual identity because they have a better chance at finding an online community in which they can relate to and therefore be a part of and “fit in”.

Like other social networking sites, Google+ has continued to thrive but perhaps it hasn't caught up with facebook as a result of their privacy issues.